Hello?
Now, in my opinion (and I'm not even a diploma in hand so that is what it's worth) that a good law is based on a logic of utilitarianism, understood in its most purely literal.
What is useful (etymologically: good, positive , the best choice ) for the most number of people.
It 's a long-standing problem, around which move always the best lawyers of the political landscape not only Europe, but intercontinental (you just think of the discrepancy existing between the formal statement independence of the matrix and the Jeffersonian insistence of estates in South America, at the time).
Beccaria, to name just one.
All this to say that determine what the true profit is difficult, especially with the introduction of the sacred system of proportional election. The people vote, they take the place of the people. And if 47% of Italians said " Upload " Silvio, now he charge.
Maroni also knows something about who had the bright idea to raise the doctors 'obligation' not to report illegal immigrants who require their care.
Now, Maroni is logically the delegate of the will of many. That would lead to say, rather superficially, that the concept of profit has been satisfied.
Superficially, as useful is inextricably linked to common sense. Common sense is the real discriminant in a democracy like ours, because although a measure such as the tax exemption would be convenient to the entire community would be equally foolish to search, since taxes are you doing with the health , pay the benches where they sit your children e!, surprise, we also pay scavengers you clean the sidewalks.
Now. Is anyone able to find common sense that, knowing it will be reported, the cladestini not only do not cure but will lead to the involuntary movement of bacteria and germs of some kind of exotic unknown crap?
Someone in the classroom and see us in the sense that from now on we are all happily exposed to contamination of diseases for which we are not even vaccinated?
. . .
Well, here, are not the only one.
0 comments:
Post a Comment